Impartial Jury? BLM Activist Reveals How He Lied to Subvert Justice and Claimed a Seat on Chauvin Trial Jury

0
437

In his mind, lying about being affiliated with BLM is a good thing because it gives people the chance to “spark some real change”. Mitchell may have claimed that he did not have any real knowledge of the case. However, it did not take long before a photo started to circulate.

He was photographed last summer wearing a shirt that demanded for the police to take their foot off of black people’s necks. Mitchell also gave a very interesting interview to Get Up! Mornings with Erica Campbell on April 27. He had a lot to say about the current state of affairs and he is trying his best to mobilize other people who feel the same way that he does.

“I mean it’s important if we wanna see some change, we wanna see some things going different, we gotta into these avenues, get into these rooms to try to spark some change,” he said. “Jury duty is one of those things. Jury duty. Voting. All of those things we gotta do.”

“Judge Cahill asked Juror #52, whether he heard anything about the #GeorgeFloyd civil case. He says, no. He explained hearing some basic info about trial dates, etc from the news in recent months, but nothing that would keep him from serving as impartial juror. #ChauvinTrial,” came the report from Minneapolis’ FOX 9 reporter Paul Blume back in March.

We find ourselves wondering how he could have expected to get away with this since there was so much evidence online about his true feelings. “Juror #52 wrote in his jury questionnaire that he wondered why other police officers at the scene did not intervene in #GeorgeFloyd deadly arrest. He recognizes the historic nature of the case. Defense says he is an acceptable juror. So state’s turn to question. #DerekChauvinTral,” Blume’s report continues.

He’s been caught dead to rights but we do not expect the mainstream media to point any of this out. Has anyone else noticed that they are A-OK with lying as long as the lies are benefiting whatever narrative they are trying to concoct at the moment. That’s how they roll.

Mitchell should be taken to task for being willing to lie to the faces of those who were responsible for selecting this just but he won’t be. If we had to guess, we are going to be one of the few outlets that even mention this. There are always a few reliable conservative outlets at times like these but they are far and far between.

Word to the wise: you may not want to discuss any of this on your Facebook page or your Twitter timeline. These sites are cracking down heavily on any conservative speech these days. If you are willing to call it like it is, this is now called “hate speech”. Don’t say that we did not warn you.

This opens a very dangerous Pandora’s box when it comes to jury selection. What’s to stop anyone from lying now, so that they can make sure that police officers are jailed? At the rate we are going, an officer is going to be convicted under unfair circumstances and we will be told “them’s the breaks”.

No one with sanity and a pulse should think that this is fair. Anyone who does not want to see the jury selection process corrupted should be speaking up about this. Without the help of brave patriots that are willing to speak out, we shudder to think of where the American justice system is headed. It is sad to see so many people being okay with this but we can assure you…we are not.